Radeon 760M vs HD 7450M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7450M with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

HD 7450M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 7 Watt
0.85

760M outperforms HD 7450M by a whopping 1671% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1126348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7672.39
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSeymourPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160512
Core clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistors370 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60083.17
Floating-point processing power0.224 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs832
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7450M 0.85
Radeon 760M 15.05
+1671%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD 7450M 329
Radeon 760M 5807
+1665%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7450M 2281
Radeon 760M 32985
+1346%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7450M 582
Radeon 760M 9603
+1551%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−3100%
32
+3100%
1440p1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24
+700%
Far Cry 5 0−1 35−40
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−542%
75−80
+542%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−155%
75−80
+155%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
Far Cry 5 0−1 35−40
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2000%
40−45
+2000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−542%
75−80
+542%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−529%
44
+529%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−260%
35−40
+260%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−155%
75−80
+155%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry 5 0−1 35−40
Hitman 3 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−542%
75−80
+542%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−429%
37
+429%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−130%
23
+130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−155%
75−80
+155%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 27−30
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Hitman 3 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−675%
30−35
+675%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 16−18
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−3000%
90−95
+3000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 10−12

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 7−8
Far Cry 5 0−1 8−9

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how HD 7450M and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is 3100% faster in 1080p
  • Radeon 760M is 1800% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 760M is 4100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 38 tests (60%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 15.05
Recency 7 January 2012 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 15 Watt

HD 7450M has 114.3% lower power consumption.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has a 1670.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7450M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon HD 7450M is a notebook card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Radeon HD 7450M
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 52 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 155 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.