UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon HD 7450M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon HD 7450M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD 7450M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 7 Watt
0.85

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs outperforms HD 7450M by a whopping 435% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1126649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.7611.72
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameSeymourTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2012 (12 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16048
Core clock speed700 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors370 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)7 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate5.600no data
Floating-point processing power0.224 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD 7450M 0.85
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.55
+435%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD 7450M 2281
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650
+367%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD 7450M 582
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510
+504%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−467%
17
+467%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−267%
11
+267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−200%
36
+200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−143%
17
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 0−1 10−11
Hitman 3 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+0%
12
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−129%
16
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+25%
8
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−45.2%
45−50
+45.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 8−9
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 4−5
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 3−4

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
+0%
12
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how HD 7450M and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 467% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 7450M is 25% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD 7450M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is ahead in 36 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 4.55
Recency 7 January 2012 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 7 Watt 28 Watt

HD 7450M has 300% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has a 435.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7450M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon HD 7450M
Radeon HD 7450M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 52 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7450M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 449 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.