UHD Graphics vs Radeon HD 6550M

Place in the ranking	1017	607
Place by popularity	not in top-100	5
Power efficiency	3.63	38.55
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	Lexington	Jasper Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	26 November 2010 (14 years ago)	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	400	256
Core clock speed	600 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	750 MHz
Number of transistors	2,154 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	12.00	12.00
Floating-point processing power	0.48 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	20	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-II	Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	14 −293%	55−60 +293%
Full HD	18 −289%	70−75 +289%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Elden Ring	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Dota 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Elden Ring	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Fortnite	6−7 −300%	24−27 +300%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
World of Tanks	27−30 −279%	110−120 +279%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Dota 2	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −300%	8−9 +300%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Valorant	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −306%	65−70 +306%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −300%	60−65 +300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Dota 2	16−18 −306%	65−70 +306%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Valorant	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

This is how HD 6550M and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics is 293% faster in 900p
UHD Graphics is 289% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.37	5.60
Recency	26 November 2010	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	26 Watt	10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 308.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6550M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.