GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs Go 7700

Place in the ranking	1268	49
Place by popularity	not in top-100	26
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	67.49
Power efficiency	no data	18.29
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G73	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 August 2006 (18 years ago)	1 December 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	17	4864
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1410 MHz
Boost clock speed	450 MHz	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	177 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	200 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.400	253.1
Floating-point processing power	no data	16.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	80
TMUs	12	152
Tensor Cores	no data	152
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	38

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7700 0.38

RTX 3060 Ti 53.15
+13887%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7700 147

RTX 3060 Ti 20433
+13800%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −14100%	142 +14100%
1440p	0−1	78
4K	-0−1	49

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.81
1440p	no data	5.12
4K	no data	8.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1913%	161 +1913%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4050%	83 +4050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1450%	124 +1450%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4450%	91 +4450%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −3567%	220 +3567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2350%	95−100 +2350%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1225%	106 +1225%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3950%	81 +3950%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1371%	103 +1371%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −3100%	192 +3100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2971%	210−220 +2971%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
World of Tanks	14−16 −1893%	270−280 +1893%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −1113%	97 +1113%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3650%	75 +3650%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1500%	110−120 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2800%	174 +2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2971%	210−220 +2971%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8650%

170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −589%	62 +589%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2400%	50 +2400%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −5150%	100−110 +5150%
Valorant	5−6 −4280%	219 +4280%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −613%	107 +613%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −613%	107 +613%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −18300%	180−190 +18300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −613%	107 +613%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	65−70
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2300%	24 +2300%
Dota 2	14−16 −627%	109 +627%
Valorant	1−2 −12100%	122 +12100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

141

+0%

141

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Metro Exodus	113 +0%	113 +0%
Valorant	320 +0%	320 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	142 +0%	142 +0%
Elden Ring	187 +0%	187 +0%
Fortnite	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	141 +0%	141 +0%
Metro Exodus	97 +0%	97 +0%
Valorant	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Dota 2	135 +0%	135 +0%
Valorant	274 +0%	274 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	97 +0%	97 +0%
Elden Ring	101 +0%	101 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	97 +0%	97 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	57 +0%	57 +0%
World of Tanks	300−350 +0%	300−350 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	139 +0%	139 +0%
Metro Exodus	93 +0%	93 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Elden Ring	57 +0%	57 +0%
Metro Exodus	43 +0%	43 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 +0%	38 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Fortnite	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	84 +0%	84 +0%

This is how Go 7700 and RTX 3060 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3060 Ti is 14100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 18300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3060 Ti is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.38	53.15
Recency	1 August 2006	1 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	8 nm

RTX 3060 Ti has a 13886.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7700 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7700 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.