Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Radeon 760M

Place in the ranking	352	412
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	68.99	19.86
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	no data
GPU code name	Phoenix	no data
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)	no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1536
Core clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2599 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	25,390 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	83.17	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.323 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8448 MHz
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 760M 14.97
+30.3%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.49

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 760M 9603
+36%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon 760M 32985
+37.1%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 760M 6142

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982
+13.7%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 760M 2116
+6.4%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	31 −29%	40 +29%
1440p	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

30
+42.9%

21−24

−42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +42.9%	35−40 −42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +40%	30−33 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +32%	75−80 −32%
Hitman 3	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +40%	55−60 −40%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +40%	30−33 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +42.9%	35−40 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +42.9%	35−40 −42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +50%	12−14 −50%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +40%	30−33 −40%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +32%	75−80 −32%
Hitman 3	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +40%	55−60 −40%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +48.6%	35−40 −48.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 +40%	30−33 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	44 +46.7%	30−33 −46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +32%	75−80 −32%
Hitman 3	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +40%	55−60 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	37 +37%	27−30 −37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +31.7%	60−65 −31.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+40%

30−33

−40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +33.3%	60−65 −33.3%
Hitman 3	18−20 +50%	12−14 −50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 +47.6%	21−24 −47.6%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +50%	18−20 −50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +33.3%	21−24 −33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	90−95 +32.9%	70−75 −32.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+38.9%

18−20

−38.9%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Hitman 3	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +38.2%	55−60 −38.2%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +50%	10−11 −50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 +50%	4−5 −50%