Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs Radeon 760M

Place in the ranking	358	436
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	68.06	24.41
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	no data
GPU code name	Hawx Point	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1536
Core clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2599 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	25,390 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	30 Watt
Texture fill rate	83.17	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.323 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8448 MHz
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Shader Model	6.8	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.1	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 760M 14.83
+39.4%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 10.64

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon 760M 9603
+51.3%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6346

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon 760M 6142

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6294
+2.5%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon 760M 41767
+19.7%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 34890

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Radeon 760M 2116
+23.6%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1712

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	31 −12.9%	35 +12.9%
1440p	19 +11.8%	17 −11.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	25 +8.7%	23 −8.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Counter-Strike 2	19 +0%	19 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +50%	8−9 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	51 +2%	50 −2%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +41.4%	27−30 −41.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +28.6%	27−30 −28.6%
Valorant	60−65 +46.3%	40−45 −46.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Counter-Strike 2	18 +12.5%	16 −12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +50%	6−7 −50%
Dota 2	23 −52.2%	35 +52.2%
Far Cry 5	29 −48.3%	40−45 +48.3%
Fortnite	80−85 +33.9%	60−65 −33.9%
Forza Horizon 4	44 +4.8%	42 −4.8%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	34 −2.9%	35 +2.9%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +41.4%	27−30 −41.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +32.1%	80−85 −32.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +28.6%	27−30 −28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +40.6%	30−35 −40.6%
Valorant	60−65 +46.3%	40−45 −46.3%
World of Tanks	190−200 +27.2%	150−160 −27.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +37.1%	35−40 −37.1%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +85.7%	14 −85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +61.1%	18−20 −61.1%
Dota 2	50−55 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +27.9%	40−45 −27.9%
Forza Horizon 4	37 +2.8%	36 −2.8%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +32.1%	80−85 −32.1%
Valorant	60−65 +46.3%	40−45 −46.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 +46.7%	15 −46.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +46.7%	15 −46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +45.6%	90−95 −45.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
World of Tanks	100−110 +36.8%	75−80 −36.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +44.4%	9 −44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +56.5%	21−24 −56.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +32.1%	28 −32.1%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +52.4%	21−24 −52.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 +42.9%	14−16 −42.9%
Valorant	35−40 +42.3%	24−27 −42.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Dota 2	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +41.9%	30−35 −41.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Dota 2	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Fortnite	16−18 +54.5%	10−12 −54.5%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Forza Horizon 5	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Valorant	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%

This is how Radeon 760M and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 13% faster in 1080p
Radeon 760M is 12% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 86% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is 52% faster.

All in all, in popular games: