Radeon RX 6650M XT vs RTX A5000 Mobile

RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A4000 Max-Q RTX A4000 Mobile RTX A4500 Embedded RTX A4500 Max-Q RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A5000 Max-Q RTX A5000 Mobile
VS
Radeon RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600S Radeon RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6700S Radeon RX 6800S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A5000 Mobile with Radeon RX 6650M XT, including specs and performance data.

RTX A5000 Mobile
2021
16 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
42.18

RX 6650M XT outperforms RTX A5000 Mobile by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000
RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9887
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency19.2825.37
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 23
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61442048
Core clock speed900 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1575 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate302.4309.2
Floating-point processing power19.35 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs192128
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX A5000 Mobile 42.18
RX 6650M XT 44.41
+5.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A5000 Mobile 16213
RX 6650M XT 17070
+5.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
−1.9%
110−120
+1.9%
1440p71
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%
4K50
+0%
50−55
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
−5.9%
120−130
+5.9%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−6.6%
95−100
+6.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
−5.9%
120−130
+5.9%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−3%
130−140
+3%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−6.6%
95−100
+6.6%
Far Cry 5 93
−36.6%
120−130
+36.6%
Fortnite 160−170
−4.1%
170−180
+4.1%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−5.3%
150−160
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−5.2%
120−130
+5.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−3.9%
150−160
+3.9%
Valorant 220−230
−3.5%
230−240
+3.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 110−120
−5.9%
120−130
+5.9%
Battlefield 5 130−140
−3%
130−140
+3%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−6.6%
95−100
+6.6%
Dota 2 132
−10.6%
140−150
+10.6%
Far Cry 5 90
−41.1%
120−130
+41.1%
Fortnite 160−170
−4.1%
170−180
+4.1%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−5.3%
150−160
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−5.2%
120−130
+5.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 122
−9%
130−140
+9%
Metro Exodus 80
−23.8%
95−100
+23.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−3.9%
150−160
+3.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+1.4%
140−150
−1.4%
Valorant 220−230
−3.5%
230−240
+3.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−3%
130−140
+3%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−6.7%
95−100
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 90−95
−6.6%
95−100
+6.6%
Dota 2 124
−17.7%
140−150
+17.7%
Far Cry 5 85
−49.4%
120−130
+49.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−5.3%
150−160
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−5.2%
120−130
+5.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−3.9%
150−160
+3.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−64.4%
140−150
+64.4%
Valorant 220−230
−3.5%
230−240
+3.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
−4.1%
170−180
+4.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
−5.6%
280−290
+5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
−2.4%
80−85
+2.4%
Metro Exodus 44
−38.6%
60−65
+38.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
−2.7%
260−270
+2.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−5.1%
100−110
+5.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−6.5%
45−50
+6.5%
Far Cry 5 79
−25.3%
95−100
+25.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−6.3%
110−120
+6.3%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−5.8%
70−75
+5.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−6.8%
75−80
+6.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−6.8%
110−120
+6.8%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−3.1%
30−35
+3.1%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
−19.7%
90−95
+19.7%
Metro Exodus 26
−46.2%
35−40
+46.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
−13.8%
65−70
+13.8%
Valorant 230−240
−5.1%
240−250
+5.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−6.5%
65−70
+6.5%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%
Dota 2 107
−7.5%
110−120
+7.5%
Far Cry 5 44
−25%
55−60
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−8.1%
80−85
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−7%
45−50
+7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
−9.4%
55−60
+9.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how RTX A5000 Mobile and RX 6650M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 2% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A5000 Mobile is 1% faster in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A5000 Mobile is 1% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 64% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A5000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 6650M XT is ahead in 63 tests (94%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 42.18 44.41
Recency 12 April 2021 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

RTX A5000 Mobile has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 5.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between RTX A5000 Mobile and Radeon RX 6650M XT.

Be aware that RTX A5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6650M XT is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile
RTX A5000
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
RX 6850M XT Radeon RX 6850M XT
RTX A5000 Mobile RTX A5000 Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 6900 6900
vs
RTX 3070 16 GB 3070 16 GB
RX 6900 AMD RX 6900
vs
A100 SXM4 80 GB 80 GB
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
vs
RX 7700 7700
RX 6900 AMD RX 6900
vs
CMP 90HX 90HX
RX 6900 AMD RX 6900
vs
A10 PCIe PCIe
RTX 3090 SUPER 3090 SUPER
vs
RX 6900 6900
RTX A1000 Embedded NVIDIA A1000 Embedded
vs
RX 7600M XT 7600M XT
RTX A4500 Embedded NVIDIA A4500 Embedded
vs
RX 7600M XT 7600M XT
Vega Frontier Edition AMD Vega Frontier Edition
vs
RTX 4050 4050
RX 6900 AMD RX 6900
vs
H100 PCIe PCIe

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 56 votes

Rate RTX A5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 69 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about RTX A5000 Mobile or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.