RTX A5000 Mobile: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
RTX A5000 Mobile provides good gaming and benchmark performance at 40.45% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 5090.
GeForce RTX5090Contents
Summary
NVIDIA started RTX A5000 Mobile sales 12 April 2021. This is an Ampere architecture notebook card based on 8 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 16 GB of GDDR6 memory clocked at 1.75 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 150 Watt.
Primary details
Some basic facts about RTX A5000 Mobile: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
| Place in the ranking | 103 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Power efficiency | 19.06 | of 100.00 (Radeon 890M) |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2024) | |
| GPU code name | GA104 | |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
RTX A5000 Mobile's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of RTX A5000 Mobile's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6144 | of 24064 (RTX PRO 6000) |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | of 2670 MHz (Arc B580) |
| Boost clock speed | 1575 MHz | of 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX) |
| Number of transistors | 17,400 million | of 153,000 million (Radeon Instinct MI300) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V) |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
| Texture fill rate | 302.4 | of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Floating-point processing power | 19.35 TFLOPS | of 126 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell) |
| ROPs | 96 | of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000) |
| TMUs | 192 | of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | of 1216 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | of 188 (RTX PRO 6000) |
Form factor & compatibility
This section provides details about the physical dimensions of RTX A5000 Mobile and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of memory installed on RTX A5000 Mobile: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | of 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X) |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X) |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile) |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
| Shared memory | - | |
| Resizable BAR | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on RTX A5000 Mobile. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
APIs supported by RTX A5000 Mobile, sometimes including their particular versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | |
| CUDA | 8.6 | |
| DLSS | + |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of RTX A5000 Mobile. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Other tests
- Passmark
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
3DMark Time Spy Graphics
Send your test results of RTX A5000 Mobile.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good RTX A5000 Mobile is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 106 | |
| 1440p | 68 | |
| 4K | 48 |
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 90−95 |
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 93 | |
| Fortnite | 160−170 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 90−95 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160 | |
| Valorant | 220−230 |
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 220−230 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | |
| Dota 2 | 132 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 90 | |
| Fortnite | 160−170 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 120−130 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 122 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 90−95 | |
| Metro Exodus | 80 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 150 | |
| Valorant | 220−230 |
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 90−95 | |
| Dota 2 | 124 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 85 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 90−95 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 150−160 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 90 | |
| Valorant | 220−230 |
| Fortnite | 160−170 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110 | |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 260−270 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 82 | |
| Metro Exodus | 44 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180 | |
| Valorant | 250−260 |
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 45−50 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 79 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 75−80 |
| Fortnite | 100−110 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 76 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | |
| Metro Exodus | 26 | |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 58 | |
| Valorant | 230−240 |
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | |
| Dota 2 | 107 | |
| Far Cry 5 | 44 | |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27 | |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55 |
| Fortnite | 50−55 |
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to RTX A5000 Mobile is Radeon Pro Vega 64X, which is slower by 17% and lower by 56 positions in our ranking.
Radeon ProVega 64XHere are some closest AMD rivals to RTX A5000 Mobile:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
RTX3000 Ada Generation MobileRTX2000 Ada Generation MobileRTXA4500 MobileRTXA4000 MobileRTXA5500 MobileQuadro RTX5000 MobileRecommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with RTX A5000 Mobile according to our statistics.
Xeon W 11955M
Core i7 11800H
Core i9 11900H
Xeon W 11855M
Core i7 11850H
Core i9 13950HX
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Core i5 11300H
Core i9 11900KF
Celeron N3350
