Radeon RX 6900 vs RTX A40

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated22
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.86
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 October 2020 (4 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107524608
Core clock speed1305 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1755 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate589.7606.2
Floating-point processing power37.74 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs11264
TMUs336288
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1812 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth695.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.6-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 255 Watt

RTX A40 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 17.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A40 and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A40 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A40
RTX A40
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 394 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 66 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.