Radeon Pro W6800 vs RTX A4000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A4000 Mobile with Radeon Pro W6800, including specs and performance data.

RTX A4000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
39.95

Pro W6800 outperforms RTX A4000 Mobile by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10653
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data23.63
Power efficiency23.8214.10
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203840
Core clock speed1140 MHz2075 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2320 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate268.8556.8
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS17.82 TFLOPS
ROPs8096
TMUs160240
Tensor Cores160no data
Ray Tracing Cores4060

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent6x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A4000 Mobile 39.95
Pro W6800 51.42
+28.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A4000 Mobile 15394
Pro W6800 19814
+28.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
−29.2%
155
+29.2%
1440p100−110
−33%
133
+33%
4K75−80
−32%
99
+32%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data14.51
1440pno data16.91
4Kno data22.72

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2413%
200−210
+2413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4900%
200−210
+4900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−411%
140−150
+411%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2413%
200−210
+2413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6825%
277
+6825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1078%
100−110
+1078%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−411%
140−150
+411%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3500%
100−110
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2713%
225
+2713%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6600%
268
+6600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1644%
157
+1644%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−411%
140−150
+411%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 45−50
Hitman 3 6−7
−1083%
70−75
+1083%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−8850%
179
+8850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4350%
85−90
+4350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 35−40

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 212
+0%
212
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
+0%
99
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 126
+0%
126
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how RTX A4000 Mobile and Pro W6800 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6800 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6800 is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6800 is 32% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6800 is 8850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6800 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.95 51.42
Recency 12 April 2021 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 250 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has 117.4% lower power consumption.

Pro W6800, on the other hand, has a 28.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6800 is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A4000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Pro W6800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Radeon Pro W6800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 21 vote

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 82 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.