RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs RTX A3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A3000 Mobile with RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX A3000 Mobile
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
32.36

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17048
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency31.6952.86
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)21 March 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40966144
Core clock speed600 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1230 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate157.4299.5
Floating-point processing power10.08 TFLOPS19.17 TFLOPS
ROPs6480
TMUs128192
Tensor Cores128192
Ray Tracing Cores3248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/s280.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.36
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 53.97
+66.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A3000 Mobile 12468
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 20796
+66.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−63.5%
170−180
+63.5%
1440p52
−63.5%
85−90
+63.5%
4K44
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 77
−55.8%
120−130
+55.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
−64.6%
130−140
+64.6%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−60.4%
170−180
+60.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−66.7%
110−120
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−61.8%
280−290
+61.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−62%
230−240
+62%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−65.1%
180−190
+65.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−62.5%
130−140
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−65.2%
190−200
+65.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−61%
190−200
+61%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−60.4%
170−180
+60.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
−60.4%
85−90
+60.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−56.6%
130−140
+56.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−61.8%
280−290
+61.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−62%
230−240
+62%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−65.1%
180−190
+65.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−62.5%
130−140
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
−64.2%
220−230
+64.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−61%
190−200
+61%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−57.1%
110−120
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
−66.7%
85−90
+66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−64.4%
120−130
+64.4%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−61.8%
280−290
+61.8%
Hitman 3 65−70
−61.8%
110−120
+61.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
−66.7%
190−200
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
−66.7%
190−200
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
−63.9%
100−105
+63.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 39
−66.7%
65−70
+66.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−62.5%
130−140
+62.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−60%
80−85
+60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−57.9%
60−65
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−59.6%
300−310
+59.6%
Hitman 3 40−45
−58.5%
65−70
+58.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−59.4%
110−120
+59.4%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−61.3%
100−105
+61.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
−62.8%
140−150
+62.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−59.1%
70−75
+59.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
−63.7%
280−290
+63.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−60.7%
90−95
+60.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−66.7%
45−50
+66.7%
Hitman 3 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−62.5%
260−270
+62.5%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−66.7%
35−40
+66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−66.7%
75−80
+66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
−66.7%
85−90
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 63% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 63% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is 59% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.36 53.97
Recency 12 April 2021 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation has a 66.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 127 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 49 votes

Rate RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.