RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs RTX A3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared RTX A3000 Mobile with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX A3000 Mobile
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
32.36

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by a whopping 131% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17015
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.14
Power efficiency31.6917.08
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104AD102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409618176
Core clock speed600 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed1230 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate157.41,423
Floating-point processing power10.08 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs128568
Tensor Cores128568
Ray Tracing Cores32142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth264.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.68.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.36
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 74.74
+131%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX A3000 Mobile 12468
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28801
+131%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX A3000 Mobile 25990
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+173%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX A3000 Mobile 71308
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+77.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX A3000 Mobile 19710
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679
+86.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−74%
181
+74%
1440p52
−227%
170
+227%
4K44
−168%
118
+168%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.56
1440pno data39.99
4Kno data57.62

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 77
−121%
170−180
+121%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−114%
150−160
+114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
−67.1%
130−140
+67.1%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−122%
230−240
+122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
−127%
150−160
+127%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−60.3%
110−120
+60.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−117%
180−190
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−39.9%
240−250
+39.9%
Hitman 3 65−70
−89.7%
120−130
+89.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−85.9%
260−270
+85.9%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−42.2%
150−160
+42.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−171%
300−350
+171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−29.7%
150−160
+29.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−114%
150−160
+114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
−94.1%
130−140
+94.1%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−122%
230−240
+122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 53
−126%
120−130
+126%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−60.3%
110−120
+60.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−117%
180−190
+117%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−39.9%
240−250
+39.9%
Hitman 3 65−70
−89.7%
120−130
+89.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−85.9%
260−270
+85.9%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−42.2%
150−160
+42.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 134
−133%
300−350
+133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−134%
150−160
+134%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−29.7%
150−160
+29.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−114%
150−160
+114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
−159%
130−140
+159%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−79.1%
120−130
+79.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 43
−121%
95−100
+121%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−60.3%
110−120
+60.3%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−39.9%
240−250
+39.9%
Hitman 3 65−70
−89.7%
120−130
+89.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
−132%
260−270
+132%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 114
−174%
300−350
+174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
−326%
260
+326%
Watch Dogs: Legion 39
−292%
150−160
+292%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−53.8%
120−130
+53.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−168%
160−170
+168%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−124%
110−120
+124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−149%
85−90
+149%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−176%
90−95
+176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−116%
80−85
+116%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−122%
60−65
+122%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−121%
80−85
+121%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−44.1%
270−280
+44.1%
Hitman 3 40−45
−161%
100−110
+161%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−174%
180−190
+174%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−59.7%
99
+59.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
−147%
210−220
+147%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−398%
219
+398%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
−40.4%
240−250
+40.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−111%
110−120
+111%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−175%
85−90
+175%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−156%
65−70
+156%
Hitman 3 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+83.9%
87
−83.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−198%
110−120
+198%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−309%
184
+309%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−190%
60−65
+190%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−211%
55−60
+211%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−160%
50−55
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−193%
130−140
+193%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
−131%
110−120
+131%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−200%
45−50
+200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−193%
80−85
+193%

This is how RTX A3000 Mobile and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 74% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 227% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 168% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 84% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 398% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 65 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.36 74.74
Recency 12 April 2021 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 300 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has 328.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 131% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 126 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 84 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.