RTX A4000 Mobile vs Quadro T500 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T500 Mobile and RTX A4000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

T500 Mobile
2020
2 GB GDDR6, 18 Watt
9.00

RTX A4000 Mobile outperforms T500 Mobile by a whopping 336% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking492120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency34.3723.46
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date2 December 2020 (4 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8965120
Core clock speed1365 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate94.92268.8
Floating-point processing power3.037 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs56160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−317%
150−160
+317%
1440p15
−333%
65−70
+333%
4K17
−312%
70−75
+312%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Far Cry 5 30
−283%
110−120
+283%
Fortnite 50−55
−212%
150−160
+212%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−281%
140−150
+281%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−410%
100−110
+410%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−383%
140−150
+383%
Valorant 85−90
−154%
210−220
+154%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−110%
270−280
+110%
Dota 2 90
−57.8%
140−150
+57.8%
Far Cry 5 28
−311%
110−120
+311%
Fortnite 50−55
−212%
150−160
+212%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−281%
140−150
+281%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−410%
100−110
+410%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
−297%
120−130
+297%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−406%
85−90
+406%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−383%
140−150
+383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
−346%
120−130
+346%
Valorant 85−90
−154%
210−220
+154%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−243%
120−130
+243%
Dota 2 75
−89.3%
140−150
+89.3%
Far Cry 5 27
−326%
110−120
+326%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−281%
140−150
+281%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−383%
140−150
+383%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
−558%
120−130
+558%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−212%
150−160
+212%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−285%
250−260
+285%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
−462%
70−75
+462%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−489%
50−55
+489%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Valorant 95−100
−162%
240−250
+162%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−395%
90−95
+395%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−412%
85−90
+412%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−410%
100−110
+410%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
−450%
75−80
+450%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
Valorant 40−45
−402%
220−230
+402%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−544%
55−60
+544%
Dota 2 28
−279%
100−110
+279%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−386%
65−70
+386%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−475%
45−50
+475%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how T500 Mobile and RTX A4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 317% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 333% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4000 Mobile is 312% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4000 Mobile is 725% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4000 Mobile is ahead in 44 tests (66%)
  • there's a draw in 23 tests (34%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.00 39.25
Recency 2 December 2020 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 115 Watt

T500 Mobile has 538.9% lower power consumption.

RTX A4000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 336.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T500 Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 109 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 21 vote

Rate RTX A4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro T500 Mobile or RTX A4000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.