GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro T2000 Max-Q with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

T2000 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
17.90

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms T2000 Max-Q by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking307271
Place by popularitynot in top-10062
Power efficiency30.6827.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117TU116
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1200 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1485 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate103.795.04
Floating-point processing power3.318 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Max-Q 17.90
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.23
+13%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Max-Q 6899
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+13%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Max-Q 11461
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+15.7%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T2000 Max-Q 39269
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+10.8%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T2000 Max-Q 8262
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+20.2%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T2000 Max-Q 41106
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+58.5%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

T2000 Max-Q 75193
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191
+446%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T2000 Max-Q 3094
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 3618
+16.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+0%
58
+0%
1440p26
−80.8%
47
+80.8%
4K46
+109%
22
−109%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−111%
59
+111%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
−15.1%
61
+15.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−63.3%
49
+63.3%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−13.8%
65−70
+13.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−47.2%
53
+47.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−64.3%
46
+64.3%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−64.3%
69
+64.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−75%
84
+75%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−9.7%
120−130
+9.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
−50%
51
+50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−106%
181
+106%
Metro Exodus 86
−5.8%
91
+5.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 64
+45.5%
44
−45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−13.6%
65−70
+13.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−134%
201
+134%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
−6.7%
32
+6.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−13.8%
65−70
+13.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−30.6%
47
+30.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−28.6%
36
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−38.1%
58
+38.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−22.9%
59
+22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−9.7%
120−130
+9.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
−47.1%
50
+47.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
−105%
180
+105%
Metro Exodus 69
−14.5%
79
+14.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+23.1%
39
−23.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−27.1%
75
+27.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−9.8%
45−50
+9.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
−113%
183
+113%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25
−8%
27
+8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+100%
15
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+16.1%
31
−16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−21.4%
34
+21.4%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.7%
39
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−9.7%
120−130
+9.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
−26.5%
43
+26.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55
−16.4%
64
+16.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−6.8%
63
+6.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−18.2%
39
+18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+291%
22
−291%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+14.6%
41
−14.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−40.7%
38
+40.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−10%
21−24
+10%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−60%
16
+60%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−23.8%
26
+23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−16.5%
110−120
+16.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
−33.3%
28
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−13.9%
40−45
+13.9%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−15.2%
35−40
+15.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−15%
21−24
+15%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
−12.1%
120
+12.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−13.8%
30−35
+13.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−53.8%
20
+53.8%
Hitman 3 12−14
−23.1%
16
+23.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+119%
42
−119%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−38.9%
25
+38.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−20%
12
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−21.1%
21−24
+21.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%

This is how T2000 Max-Q and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 81% faster in 1440p
  • T2000 Max-Q is 109% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Max-Q is 291% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 134% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 64 tests (89%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.90 20.23
Recency 27 May 2019 23 April 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

T2000 Max-Q has 25% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 13% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 10 months.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro T2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 75 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1672 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.