NVIDIA started Quadro T2000 Max-Q sales 27 May 2019. This is a Turing architecture notebook card based on 12 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 2 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 40 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro T2000 Max-Q: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking	307
Place by popularity	not in top-100
Power efficiency	30.64	of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Quadro T2000 Max-Q's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro T2000 Max-Q's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	of 21760 (GeForce RTX 5090)
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	of 2670 MHz (Arc B580)
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	of 3599 MHz (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors	4,700 million	of 208,000 million (B200 SXM 192 GB)
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	of 3 nm (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	of 2400 Watt (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate	103.7	of 2,554 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Floating-point processing power	3.318 TFLOPS	of 109.7 (GeForce RTX 5090)
ROPs	32	of 192 (Radeon RX 7900 XTX)
TMUs	64	of 1280 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro T2000 Max-Q and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro T2000 Max-Q: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	of 294912 (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width	128 Bit	of 8192 Bit (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	of 20000 (RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile)
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	of 5,171 GB/s (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Shared memory	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro T2000 Max-Q. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

APIs supported by Quadro T2000 Max-Q, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro T2000 Max-Q. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T2000 Max-Q 17.88

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T2000 Max-Q 6890

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

T2000 Max-Q 11461

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

T2000 Max-Q 39269

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

T2000 Max-Q 8262

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

T2000 Max-Q 41106

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

T2000 Max-Q 75193

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

T2000 Max-Q 3094

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

T2000 Max-Q 51

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

T2000 Max-Q 97

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

T2000 Max-Q 75

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

T2000 Max-Q 91

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

T2000 Max-Q 89

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

T2000 Max-Q 32

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

T2000 Max-Q 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

T2000 Max-Q 7

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

T2000 Max-Q 40

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

T2000 Max-Q 51

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

T2000 Max-Q 91

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

T2000 Max-Q 97

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

T2000 Max-Q 75

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

T2000 Max-Q 89

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

T2000 Max-Q 32

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

T2000 Max-Q 7.1

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

T2000 Max-Q 94

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

T2000 Max-Q 94

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro T2000 Max-Q is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD	58
1440p	26
4K	46

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33
Battlefield 5	55−60
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30
Far Cry 5	40−45
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50
Forza Horizon 4	110−120
Hitman 3	30−35
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90
Metro Exodus	86
Red Dead Redemption 2	64
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33
Battlefield 5	55−60
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30
Far Cry 5	40−45
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50
Forza Horizon 4	110−120
Hitman 3	30−35
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90
Metro Exodus	69
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30
Far Cry 5	40−45
Forza Horizon 4	110−120
Hitman 3	30−35
Horizon Zero Dawn	55
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	33
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11
Far Cry 5	21−24
Forza Horizon 4	95−100
Hitman 3	21−24
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40
Metro Exodus	30−35
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14
Hitman 3	12−14
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95
Metro Exodus	18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4
Far Cry 5	10−11
Forza Horizon 4	24−27
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

Closest competitors

Quadro T2000 Max-Q's performance relative to its closest rivals among mobile workstation graphics cards.

Quadro T1200 Mobile 108.72

Quadro T600 Mobile 102.74

Quadro M5000M 101.62

Quadro T2000 Max-Q 100

Radeon Pro 5500M 98.38

RTX A500 Mobile 98.15

Quadro T1000 Max-Q 97.54

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro T2000 Max-Q is Radeon Pro 5500M, which is slower by 2% and lower by 3 positions in our ranking.