Radeon Pro W6600M vs Quadro T1200 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro T1200 Mobile and Radeon Pro W6600M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Pro W6600M outperforms T1200 Mobile by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 285 | 221 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 74.72 | 18.98 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024) |
| GPU code name | TU117 | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 8 June 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1024 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 855 MHz | 1224 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | 2034 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 4,700 million | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 91.20 | 227.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.918 TFLOPS | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 28 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 58
−20.7%
| 70−75
+20.7%
|
| 1440p | 33
−21.2%
| 40−45
+21.2%
|
| 4K | 81
−23.5%
| 100−110
+23.5%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−87.5%
|
60−65
+87.5%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−70.5%
|
75−80
+70.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 47
−27.7%
|
60−65
+27.7%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
−75.4%
|
110−120
+75.4%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−77.5%
|
70−75
+77.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−87.5%
|
60−65
+87.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
−20%
|
75−80
+20%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
−66%
|
85−90
+66%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
−47.2%
|
180−190
+47.2%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
−89.7%
|
70−75
+89.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 60
−150%
|
150−160
+150%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
−60.4%
|
85−90
+60.4%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 59
−114%
|
120−130
+114%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 54
−126%
|
120−130
+126%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−70.5%
|
75−80
+70.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 28
−114%
|
60−65
+114%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
−75.4%
|
110−120
+75.4%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
−77.5%
|
70−75
+77.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−87.5%
|
60−65
+87.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59
−32.2%
|
75−80
+32.2%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
−66%
|
85−90
+66%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
−47.2%
|
180−190
+47.2%
|
| Hitman 3 | 35−40
−89.7%
|
70−75
+89.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 47
−219%
|
150−160
+219%
|
| Metro Exodus | 65−70
−68.1%
|
110−120
+68.1%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55
−60.4%
|
85−90
+60.4%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 44
−186%
|
120−130
+186%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 71
−2.8%
|
70−75
+2.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 47
−160%
|
120−130
+160%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 40−45
−70.5%
|
75−80
+70.5%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21
−186%
|
60−65
+186%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
−23.1%
|
80−85
+23.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 30−35
−87.5%
|
60−65
+87.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 56
−39.3%
|
75−80
+39.3%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
−22.6%
|
65−70
+22.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
−47.2%
|
180−190
+47.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 37
−97.3%
|
70−75
+97.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 19
−542%
|
120−130
+542%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| Hitman 3 | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 32
−25%
|
40−45
+25%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
−21.6%
|
45−50
+21.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
−21.2%
|
40−45
+21.2%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
−22%
|
50−55
+22%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
−17.4%
|
27−30
+17.4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
−90%
|
35−40
+90%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18
−111%
|
35−40
+111%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
−18.4%
|
45−50
+18.4%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
−117%
|
24−27
+117%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
−16.7%
|
35−40
+16.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 110−120
−80.2%
|
200−210
+80.2%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 12
−1392%
|
170−180
+1392%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
| Hitman 3 | 14−16
−86.7%
|
27−30
+86.7%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 100−110
−64.1%
|
160−170
+64.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
−105%
|
40−45
+105%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
−23.5%
|
21−24
+23.5%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
−22.7%
|
27−30
+22.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−105%
|
40−45
+105%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
−91.7%
|
21−24
+91.7%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
−110%
|
21−24
+110%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−20%
|
24−27
+20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−175%
|
10−12
+175%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−81.8%
|
20−22
+81.8%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
−20%
|
18−20
+20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
−77.8%
|
45−50
+77.8%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 8−9
−113%
|
16−18
+113%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Metro Exodus | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how T1200 Mobile and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:
- Pro W6600M is 21% faster in 1080p
- Pro W6600M is 21% faster in 1440p
- Pro W6600M is 23% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 1392% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Pro W6600M is ahead in 51 test (71%)
- there's a draw in 21 test (29%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.43 | 24.68 |
| Recency | 12 April 2021 | 8 June 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 18 Watt | 90 Watt |
T1200 Mobile has 400% lower power consumption.
Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 27% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1200 Mobile in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
