Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro W5300M Radeon Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W6300M Radeon Pro W6600M
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5500M and Quadro T1200 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro W5500M
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
9.03

T1200 Mobile outperforms Pro W5500M by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro W5500M Pro W5500M
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking493300
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.2874.12
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14081024
Core clock speed1000 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate127.691.20
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−142%
58
+142%
1440p14−16
−136%
33
+136%
4K35−40
−131%
81
+131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how Pro W5500M and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 142% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 136% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 131% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.03 19.46
Recency 10 February 2020 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 18 Watt

Pro W5500M has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 115.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 372.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro W5500M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
vs
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
vs
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
Pro W5500 AMD Radeon Pro W5500
vs
GTX 670 GTX 670
RX 5600 XT AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
vs
HD 6770 HD 6770
RX 5600 XT AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
vs
R7 Mobile Graphics R7 Mobile Graphics
RX 6500M AMD RX 6500M
vs
RX 5900 XT RX 5900 XT
Xe DG1-SDV Intel Xe DG1 SDV
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
RX 5500 OEM AMD Radeon RX 5500 OEM
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 GTX 1650 GDDR6
RX 5800 XT Radeon RX 5800 XT
vs
RTX 3090 Ti 3090 Ti
RX 5900 AMD Radeon RX 5900
vs
Vega 7 Vega 7
RX 5950 XT Radeon RX 5950 XT
vs
RTX 2080 Engineering Sample 2080 Engineering Sample
RTX 2080 Super Mobile NVIDIA RTX 2080 Super Mobile
vs
RTX 3070 Max-Q 3070 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 146 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500M or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.