A10G vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with A10G, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Max-Q
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
32.42

A10G outperforms RTX 4000 Max-Q by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking16968
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.7822.21
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU104GA102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25609216
Core clock speed780 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate220.8492.5
Floating-point processing power7.066 TFLOPS31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160288
Tensor Cores320288
Ray Tracing Cores4072

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz1563 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s600.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 32.42
A10G 48.59
+49.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 12494
A10G 18723
+49.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
−48.9%
140−150
+48.9%
1440p46
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
4K55
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−42.9%
100−105
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−41.5%
150−160
+41.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−44.5%
250−260
+44.5%
Hitman 3 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−47.9%
210−220
+47.9%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−46.8%
160−170
+46.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−47.8%
170−180
+47.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−44.1%
170−180
+44.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−42.9%
100−105
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Battlefield 5 100−110
−41.5%
150−160
+41.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
−46.3%
120−130
+46.3%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−44.5%
250−260
+44.5%
Hitman 3 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−47.9%
210−220
+47.9%
Metro Exodus 100−110
−46.8%
160−170
+46.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−47.8%
170−180
+47.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−44.1%
170−180
+44.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
−42.9%
100−105
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
−42.9%
80−85
+42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−43.9%
95−100
+43.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−37%
100−105
+37%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−44.5%
250−260
+44.5%
Hitman 3 65−70
−47.1%
100−105
+47.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140−150
−47.9%
210−220
+47.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−47.8%
170−180
+47.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−42.9%
90−95
+42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−44.1%
170−180
+44.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
−37.5%
110−120
+37.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
−40%
70−75
+40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
−47.1%
50−55
+47.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
−49.7%
280−290
+49.7%
Hitman 3 40−45
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−44.9%
100−105
+44.9%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−45.2%
90−95
+45.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
−44.7%
110−120
+44.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−47.7%
65−70
+47.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 170−180
−46.2%
250−260
+46.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−45.5%
80−85
+45.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Hitman 3 24−27
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
−43.8%
230−240
+43.8%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−37.5%
55−60
+37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−42.9%
30−33
+42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−42.1%
27−30
+42.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−35%
27−30
+35%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−33.3%
24−27
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−44.4%
65−70
+44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−39.5%
60−65
+39.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

This is how RTX 4000 Max-Q and A10G compete in popular games:

  • A10G is 49% faster in 1080p
  • A10G is 41% faster in 1440p
  • A10G is 45% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.42 48.59
Recency 27 May 2019 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

RTX 4000 Max-Q has 87.5% lower power consumption.

A10G, on the other hand, has a 49.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

The A10G is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while A10G is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 22 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 40 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.