RTX A3000 Mobile vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	168	167
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	29.69	34.03
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	GA104
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	4096
Core clock speed	780 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1230 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	220.8	157.4
Floating-point processing power	7.066 TFLOPS	10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160	128
Tensor Cores	320	128
Ray Tracing Cores	40	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1625 MHz	1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	416.0 GB/s	264.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 32.37

RTX A3000 Mobile 32.46
+0.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 12487

RTX A3000 Mobile 12520
+0.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 23574

RTX A3000 Mobile 25990
+10.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 17049

RTX A3000 Mobile 19710
+15.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 35167
+17.2%

RTX A3000 Mobile 29996

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	85 −16.5%	99 +16.5%
1440p	46 +0%	46 +0%
4K	45 +12.5%	40 −12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60

−40%

77
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −41.1%	79 +41.1%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −20%	66 +20%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Hitman 3	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 −21.4%	68 +21.4%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +3.8%	53 −3.8%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Hitman 3	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Metro Exodus	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −16.5%	134 +16.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +9.8%	51 −9.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65−70 −1.5%	65−70 +1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +27.9%	43 −27.9%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Hitman 3	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +24.6%	114 −24.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +0.9%	114 −0.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	63 +3.3%	61 −3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +203%	39 −203%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85

+0%

80−85

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −17.4%	27 +17.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −0.5%	180−190 +0.5%
Hitman 3	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75−80 −13.2%	86 +13.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

−1.8%

55−60
+1.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Hitman 3	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	36 −25%	45 +25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −18.6%	51 +18.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

+0%

27−30

+0%

This is how RTX 4000 Max-Q and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A3000 Mobile is 16% faster in 1080p
A tie in 1440p
RTX 4000 Max-Q is 13% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4000 Max-Q is 203% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 41% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4000 Max-Q is ahead in 7 tests (10%)
RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 18 tests (25%)
there's a draw in 47 tests (65%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.37	32.46
Recency	27 May 2019	12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	70 Watt

RTX 4000 Max-Q has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 0.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 14.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and RTX A3000 Mobile.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.