Quadro P2200 vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 and Quadro P2200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.46

P2200 outperforms P620 by a whopping 156% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.2122.15
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP107GP106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)10 June 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121280
Core clock speed1177 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz1493 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate46.18119.4
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS3.822 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs3280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm201 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB5 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s200.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.46
Quadro P2200 24.23
+156%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3645
Quadro P2200 9335
+156%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 12085
Quadro P2200 32445
+168%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P620 10961
Quadro P2200 31058
+183%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P620 11727
Quadro P2200 29989
+156%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−156%
110−120
+156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−150%
130−140
+150%
Metro Exodus 35
−143%
85−90
+143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
−155%
140−150
+155%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−146%
150−160
+146%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−141%
70−75
+141%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−150%
130−140
+150%
Metro Exodus 28
−150%
70−75
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−142%
75−80
+142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−146%
150−160
+146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−137%
45−50
+137%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−133%
35−40
+133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−150%
55−60
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−154%
160−170
+154%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−150%
130−140
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−142%
75−80
+142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−135%
40−45
+135%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−146%
150−160
+146%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−150%
65−70
+150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−144%
100−105
+144%
Hitman 3 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−131%
30−33
+131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−150%
150−160
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Hitman 3 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−144%
95−100
+144%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−133%
21−24
+133%

This is how Quadro P620 and Quadro P2200 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P2200 is 156% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.46 24.23
Recency 1 February 2018 10 June 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 5 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P620 has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

Quadro P2200, on the other hand, has a 156.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Quadro P2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 618 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 365 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.