Radeon RX Vega 5 vs Quadro P4200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 with Radeon RX Vega 5, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4200
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
25.14
+442%

P4200 outperforms RX Vega 5 by a whopping 442% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking211647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.4021.41
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Vega
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304320
Core clock speed1227 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1647 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate237.2no data
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+428%
18
−428%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+356%
9
−356%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+267%
15
−267%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+258%
12
−258%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+292%
13
−292%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+480%
10−11
−480%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+408%
12−14
−408%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+403%
27−30
−403%
Hitman 3 50−55
+538%
8
−538%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+274%
30−35
−274%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+330%
20
−330%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+261%
18
−261%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+400%
16−18
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+323%
12−14
−323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+975%
4−5
−975%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+583%
12−14
−583%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+325%
12
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+480%
10−11
−480%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+408%
12−14
−408%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+403%
27−30
−403%
Hitman 3 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+274%
30−35
−274%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+473%
15
−473%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+364%
14
−364%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+400%
17
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+218%
16−18
−218%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+323%
12−14
−323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+975%
4−5
−975%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+480%
10−11
−480%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+403%
27−30
−403%
Hitman 3 50−55
+410%
10−11
−410%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+274%
30−35
−274%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+507%
14
−507%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+500%
9
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+129%
45−50
−129%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+442%
12
−442%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+433%
9−10
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+525%
4−5
−525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+480%
5−6
−480%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+1500%
9−10
−1500%
Hitman 3 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+373%
10−12
−373%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+450%
10−11
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+390%
27−30
−390%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+367%
9−10
−367%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Hitman 3 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+3125%
4−5
−3125%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+750%
4−5
−750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+520%
5−6
−520%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%

This is how Quadro P4200 and RX Vega 5 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4200 is 428% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P4200 is 3125% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P4200 surpassed RX Vega 5 in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.14 4.64
Recency 21 February 2018 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro P4200 has a 441.8% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 5, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 5 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 5 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
AMD Radeon RX Vega 5
Radeon RX Vega 5

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 57 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 212 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 5 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.