GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4200 Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Max-Q Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q
VS
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 Max-Q with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P5200 Max-Q
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.48
+76%

P5200 Max-Q outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P5200 Max-Q P5200 Max-Q
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking166296
Place by popularitynot in top-10078
Power efficiency22.6425.72
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601024
Core clock speed1316 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1569 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate251.099.84
Floating-point processing power8.033 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1804 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.9 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 32.48
+76%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P5200 Max-Q 12530
+76.1%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+75.4%
57
−75.4%
1440p65−70
+75.7%
37
−75.7%
4K35−40
+59.1%
22
−59.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
+0%
55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 166
+0%
166
+0%
Hitman 3 47
+0%
47
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 164
+0%
164
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 117
+0%
117
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+0%
80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Battlefield 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+0%
148
+0%
Hitman 3 42
+0%
42
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 148
+0%
148
+0%
Metro Exodus 68
+0%
68
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
+0%
55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 141
+0%
141
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+0%
30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+0%
8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hitman 3 37
+0%
37
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
+0%
57
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+0%
17
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 34
+0%
34
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+0%
22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hitman 3 26
+0%
26
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 115
+0%
115
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+0%
17
+0%
Hitman 3 14
+0%
14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+0%
12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P5200 Max-Q is 75% faster in 1080p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 76% faster in 1440p
  • P5200 Max-Q is 59% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 32.48 18.45
Recency 21 February 2018 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

P5200 Max-Q has a 76% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
P5200 Max-Q Quadro P5200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
Volari V3 XT
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
RX Vega 2 Radeon RX Vega 2
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
540 Mobile Radeon 540 Mobile
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB Jetson AGX Xavier 16 GB
Instinct MI50 Radeon Instinct MI50
vs
CMP 170HX 10 GB CMP 170HX 10 GB
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
GMA GMA
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GA107 GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
9500 GS GeForce 9500 GS
vs
ATI HD 4250 Radeon HD 4250
Volari 8300
vs
Instinct MI300X Radeon Instinct MI300X
Pro 570X Radeon Pro 570X
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3255 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.