GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1050 Mobile GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GTX 1060 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Mobile GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q GTX 1660 Ti Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.46
+65.1%

M6000 outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by an impressive 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking180296
Place by popularitynot in top-10078
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.24no data
Power efficiency8.4325.54
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (9 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721024
Core clock speed988 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate213.999.84
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs19264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M6000 30.46
+65.1%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.45

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M6000 11749
+65.1%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+60.7%
56
−60.7%
1440p60−65
+62.2%
37
−62.2%
4K35−40
+59.1%
22
−59.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p46.67no data
1440p70.00no data
4K120.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
+0%
55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 166
+0%
166
+0%
Hitman 3 47
+0%
47
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 164
+0%
164
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 117
+0%
117
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+0%
80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Battlefield 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+0%
148
+0%
Hitman 3 42
+0%
42
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 148
+0%
148
+0%
Metro Exodus 68
+0%
68
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
+0%
55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 141
+0%
141
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+0%
30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+0%
8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hitman 3 37
+0%
37
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
+0%
57
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+0%
17
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 34
+0%
34
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+0%
22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hitman 3 26
+0%
26
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 115
+0%
115
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+0%
17
+0%
Hitman 3 14
+0%
14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+0%
12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how Quadro M6000 and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M6000 is 61% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M6000 is 62% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M6000 is 59% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.46 18.45
Recency 21 March 2015 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M6000 has a 65.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Quadro P4000 Quadro P4000
RX 7600 Radeon RX 7600
vs
RSX-90nm RSX 90nm
R7 M370 Radeon R7 M370
vs
RTX A500 Mobile RTX A500 Mobile
RTX 4050 GeForce RTX 4050
vs
MX450 12W GeForce MX450 12W
ATI HD 5850 Radeon HD 5850
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile Iris Xe Graphics 80EU Mobile
Iris Plus Graphics G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
RX 460 1024SP Radeon RX 460 1024SP
ATI M3 M3
vs
RTX 3080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
FirePro S7150 FirePro S7150
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
GTX 960A GeForce GTX 960A
vs
HD Graphics 520 HD Graphics 520
Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
vs
RTX A4500 Mobile RTX A4500 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 148 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3247 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.