GeForce MX450 12W vs RTX 4050

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking124not rated
Place by popularity45not in top-100
Power efficiency25.70no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAD107TU117S
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2023 (1 year ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560896
Core clock speed2505 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed2640 MHz930 MHz
Number of transistors18,900 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate211.252.08
Floating-point processing power13.52 TFLOPS1.667 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8056
Tensor Cores120no data
Ray Tracing Cores18no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x4
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width96 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth216.0 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.76.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.97.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 12 Watt

RTX 4050 has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

MX450 12W, on the other hand, has 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4050 and GeForce MX450 12W. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 is a desktop card while GeForce MX450 12W is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
GeForce RTX 4050
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 12W
GeForce MX450 12W

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 2065 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GeForce MX450 12W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.