GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Quadro M5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M5000
2015
8 GB 256-bit, 150 Watt
24.30
+31.6%

M5000 outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking230300
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.09no data
Power efficiency11.1025.31
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM204TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,856.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed861 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate132.999.84
Floating-point processing power4.252 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs12864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 211 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA5.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M5000 24.30
+31.6%
GTX 1650 Mobile 18.47

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M5000 9360
+31.5%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+29.3%
58
−29.3%
1440p45−50
+21.6%
37
−21.6%
4K24−27
+20%
20
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p38.09no data
1440p63.49no data
4K119.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
+0%
55
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+0%
42
+0%
Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 166
+0%
166
+0%
Hitman 3 47
+0%
47
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 164
+0%
164
+0%
Metro Exodus 82
+0%
82
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 117
+0%
117
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80
+0%
80
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+0%
24
+0%
Battlefield 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+0%
148
+0%
Hitman 3 42
+0%
42
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 148
+0%
148
+0%
Metro Exodus 68
+0%
68
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55
+0%
55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 141
+0%
141
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+0%
30
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
+0%
8
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
34
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+0%
62
+0%
Hitman 3 37
+0%
37
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
+0%
57
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
+0%
17
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 52
+0%
52
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 34
+0%
34
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+0%
22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 99
+0%
99
+0%
Hitman 3 26
+0%
26
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 115
+0%
115
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+0%
33
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+0%
17
+0%
Hitman 3 14
+0%
14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+0%
21
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+0%
12
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+0%
17
+0%

This is how Quadro M5000 and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M5000 is 29% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M5000 is 22% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro M5000 is 20% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.30 18.47
Recency 29 June 2015 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro M5000 has a 31.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000
Quadro M5000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 78 votes

Rate Quadro M5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3309 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.