GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs Quadro K4200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro K4200 with GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.
K4200 outperforms GT 640 Rev. 2 by a whopping 216% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 418 | 720 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.08 | 0.19 |
| Power efficiency | 7.18 | 5.01 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) |
| GPU code name | GK104 | GK208 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 July 2014 (10 years ago) | 29 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $854.99 | $89 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Quadro K4200 has 995% better value for money than GT 640 Rev. 2.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1344 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 771 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 784 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,540 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 87.81 | 33.47 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.107 TFLOPS | 0.8033 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 8 |
| TMUs | 112 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
| Length | 241 mm | 145 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1252 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 172.8 GB/s | 40.06 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | + | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.21 | 3.55 |
| Recency | 22 July 2014 | 29 May 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 49 Watt |
Quadro K4200 has a 215.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GT 640 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 120.4% lower power consumption.
The Quadro K4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
