GeForce RTX 4070 vs Quadro FX 770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 770M with GeForce RTX 4070, including specs and performance data.

FX 770M
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.57

RTX 4070 outperforms FX 770M by a whopping 12167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking121120
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0160.23
Power efficiency1.1223.96
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG96AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)12 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$527 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 has 602200% better value for money than FX 770M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325888
Core clock speed500 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors314 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000455.4
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 770M 0.57
RTX 4070 69.92
+12167%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 770M 220
RTX 4070 26936
+12144%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−21800%
219
+21800%
1440p1−2
−12300%
124
+12300%
4K0−176

Cost per frame, $

1080p527.002.74
1440p527.004.83
4Kno data7.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7100%
216
+7100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3500%
140−150
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3867%
110−120
+3867%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5700%
174
+5700%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2209%
250−260
+2209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4800%
290−300
+4800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−410%
150−160
+410%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3500%
140−150
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3867%
110−120
+3867%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4667%
143
+4667%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−17000%
170−180
+17000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2209%
250−260
+2209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−6167%
376
+6167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1400%
150−160
+1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−410%
150−160
+410%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−3500%
140−150
+3500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−3867%
110−120
+3867%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4167%
128
+4167%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2480%
120−130
+2480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2564%
293
+2564%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5267%
322
+5267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−1600%
170
+1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−313%
124
+313%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−11000%
110−120
+11000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 80−85
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8100%
80−85
+8100%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1600%
100−110
+1600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−7300%
222
+7300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−23800%
230−240
+23800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3733%
110−120
+3733%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 55−60

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3700%
75−80
+3700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 143
+0%
143
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+0%
222
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+0%
115
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
+0%
121
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50
+0%
50
+0%

This is how FX 770M and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 21800% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 12300% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 is 23800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 69.92
Recency 14 August 2008 12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

FX 770M has 471.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070, on the other hand, has a 12166.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 770M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 vote

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9336 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.