Radeon RX 5300 vs Quadro FX 700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.67
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNV35Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date17 March 2004 (20 years ago)28 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1408
Core clock speed275 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors135 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs888

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data180 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s168.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 March 2004 28 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm

RX 5300 has an age advantage of 16 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 700 and Radeon RX 5300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 700 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 700
Quadro FX 700
AMD Radeon RX 5300
Radeon RX 5300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 33 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.