UHD Graphics 730 vs Quadro 5010M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5010M with UHD Graphics 730, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5010M
2011
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
4.40
+5.5%

5010M outperforms UHD Graphics 730 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking671688
Place by popularitynot in top-10076
Power efficiency3.0419.18
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGF110Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date22 February 2011 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6018.60
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.5952 TFLOPS
ROPs326
TMUs4812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed650 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth83.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5010M 4.40
+5.5%
UHD Graphics 730 4.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5010M 1691
+5.5%
UHD Graphics 730 1603

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p38
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Full HD59
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Elden Ring 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Valorant 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Dota 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Elden Ring 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Fortnite 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Valorant 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
World of Tanks 70−75
+12.3%
65−70
−12.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Dota 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Valorant 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Elden Ring 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
World of Tanks 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Valorant 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Valorant 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

This is how Quadro 5010M and UHD Graphics 730 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 5010M is 9% faster in 900p
  • Quadro 5010M is 7% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.40 4.17
Recency 22 February 2011 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro 5010M has a 5.5% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro 5010M and UHD Graphics 730.

Be aware that Quadro 5010M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M
Intel UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro 5010M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1297 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.