FirePro RG220A vs Quadro FX 4600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1079not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.57no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG80RV711
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)1 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9680
Core clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors681 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate24.004.000
Floating-point processing power0.2304 TFLOPS0.08 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount768 MB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s51.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 March 2007 1 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 35 Watt

FX 4600 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RG220A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 63.6% more advanced lithography process, and 282.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4600 and FirePro RG220A. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
AMD FirePro RG220A
FirePro RG220A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro RG220A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.