GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER vs FireStream 9350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameCypressGA104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14406144
Core clock speed700 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million18,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40325.4
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPS20.83 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs72192

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm242 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 250 Watt

FireStream 9350 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9350 and GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9350 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 208 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.