Quadro FX 1500 vs Quadro FX 370 LP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 370 LP and Quadro FX 1500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 370 LP
2008
256 MB DDR2, 25 Watt
0.28

FX 1500 outperforms FX 370 LP by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13451246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.770.47
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG98G71
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date6 November 2008 (16 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 370 LP and FX 1500 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed540 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors210 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate4.3207.800
Floating-point processing power0.01728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mm173 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz625 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s40 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 370 LP 0.28
FX 1500 0.44
+57.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 370 LP 108
FX 1500 169
+56.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 0.44
Recency 6 November 2008 20 April 2006
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 65 Watt

FX 370 LP has an age advantage of 2 years, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.

FX 1500, on the other hand, has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Quadro FX 1500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370 LP in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
Quadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500
Quadro FX 1500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 33 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.