Quadro FX 370 LP vs Quadro FX 370

Place in the ranking	1379	1343
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Power efficiency	0.43	0.77
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	G84	G98
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 September 2007 (17 years ago)	6 November 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$129	$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 370 and FX 370 LP have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	8
Core clock speed	360 MHz	540 MHz
Number of transistors	289 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	2.880	4.320
Floating-point processing power	0.02304 TFLOPS	0.01728 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	198 mm	198 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	DDR2
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	256 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	8 GB/s	8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI

1x DMS-59

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	4.0	4.0
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	1.1	1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 370 0.22

FX 370 LP 0.28
+27.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 370 83

FX 370 LP 108
+30.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.22	0.28
Recency	12 September 2007	6 November 2008
Chip lithography	80 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	25 Watt

FX 370 LP has a 27.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 23.1% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The Quadro FX 370 LP is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.