GRID K200 vs Quadro FX 350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG72GK104
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)28 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$235

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed550 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors112 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate2.20095.36
Floating-point processing powerno data2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs4128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 28 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 225 Watt

FX 350 has 971.4% lower power consumption.

GRID K200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and GRID K200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350
NVIDIA GRID K200
GRID K200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID K200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.