RTX A3000 Mobile vs Quadro 1000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 1000M and RTX A3000 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro 1000M
2011
2 GB DDR3, 45 Watt
1.47

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms 1000M by a whopping 2101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking987170
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
Power efficiency2.2431.69
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGF108GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date13 January 2011 (13 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$174.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964096
Core clock speed700 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1230 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate11.20157.4
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs16128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 1000M 1.47
RTX A3000 Mobile 32.36
+2101%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 1000M 566
RTX A3000 Mobile 12468
+2103%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro 1000M 943
RTX A3000 Mobile 25990
+2656%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro 1000M 4566
RTX A3000 Mobile 71308
+1462%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD41
−154%
104
+154%
1440p2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
4K1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.27no data
1440p87.48no data
4K174.95no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1825%
77
+1825%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1550%
66
+1550%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3550%
70−75
+3550%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2667%
80−85
+2667%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4225%
170−180
+4225%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1033%
65−70
+1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−847%
140−150
+847%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1338%
110−120
+1338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−258%
110−120
+258%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1225%
53
+1225%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3550%
70−75
+3550%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2667%
80−85
+2667%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4225%
170−180
+4225%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1033%
65−70
+1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−847%
140−150
+847%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1575%
134
+1575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−518%
65−70
+518%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−258%
110−120
+258%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1067%
70−75
+1067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−975%
43
+975%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3550%
70−75
+3550%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4225%
170−180
+4225%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1033%
65−70
+1033%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−660%
114
+660%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1325%
114
+1325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−455%
61
+455%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−18.2%
39
+18.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2567%
80−85
+2567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2600%
27
+2600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%
Hitman 3 7−8
−486%
40−45
+486%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−1280%
65−70
+1280%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−2343%
170−180
+2343%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 20−22
Far Cry 5 0−1 18−20

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+0%
79
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 68
+0%
68
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+0%
51
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 86
+0%
86
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51
+0%
51
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Quadro 1000M and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 154% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 2500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A3000 Mobile is 4300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.47 32.36
Recency 13 January 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 70 Watt

Quadro 1000M has 55.6% lower power consumption.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2101.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 1000M
Quadro 1000M
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 122 votes

Rate Quadro 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 127 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.