Quadro 3000M X2 vs RTX A3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking164not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGA104EXMF104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4096240
Core clock speed1080 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors17,400 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)150 Watt
Texture fill rate237.618.00
Floating-point performance15.21 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.62.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 22 February 2011
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 150 Watt

RTX A3000 Mobile has an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 400% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between RTX A3000 Mobile and Quadro 3000M X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that RTX A3000 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 3000M X2 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M X2
Quadro 3000M X2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 124 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro 3000M X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.