Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVS 2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
NVS 2100M NVS 3100M NVS 4200M NVS 5100M NVS 5200M NVS 5400M
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared NVS 2100M and Quadro T2000 Max-Q, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 2100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, 11 Watt
0.36

T2000 Max-Q outperforms NVS 2100M by a whopping 4864% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

NVS 2100M NVS 2100M
T2000 Max-Q T2000 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1275303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.2831.15
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT218TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161024
Core clock speed535 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors260 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)11 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate4.280103.7
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS3.318 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.27.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 2100M 0.36
T2000 Max-Q 17.87
+4864%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 2100M 139
T2000 Max-Q 6892
+4858%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

NVS 2100M 992
T2000 Max-Q 39269
+3859%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5400%
55
+5400%
1440p0−126
4K0−138

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1375%
55−60
+1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−207%
85−90
+207%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1375%
55−60
+1375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−356%
40−45
+356%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−207%
85−90
+207%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1300%
27−30
+1300%
Hitman 3 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−588%
55
+588%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1375%
55−60
+1375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−267%
33
+267%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−207%
85−90
+207%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 10−11
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1350%
27−30
+1350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−700%
16−18
+700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+0%
86
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 64
+0%
64
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 69
+0%
69
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 47
+0%
47
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how NVS 2100M and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is 5400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T2000 Max-Q is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T2000 Max-Q is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.36 17.87
Recency 7 January 2010 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 11 Watt 40 Watt

NVS 2100M has 263.6% lower power consumption.

T2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 4863.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 2100M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 2100M NVS 2100M
vs
ATI Mobility FireGL V5700 Mobility FireGL V5700
T2000 Max-Q Quadro T2000 Max-Q
vs
M5000M Quadro M5000M
NVS 2100M NVS 2100M
vs
NVS 150M Quadro NVS 150M
GeForce 615 GeForce 615
vs
RTX 6000 Quadro RTX 6000
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce 920M GeForce 920M
vs
Pro 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M
ATI Xbox 360 GPU Xbox 360 GPU
vs
RX 6550S Radeon RX 6550S
GTS 360M GeForce GTS 360M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5730 Mobility Radeon HD 5730
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
vs
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
HD 7870M Radeon HD 7870M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 640
RX 550 Radeon RX 550
vs
FirePro M4170 FirePro M4170
HD 7850 Radeon HD 7850
vs
HD 7720 OEM Radeon HD 7720 OEM
GTX 980 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
vs
GRID K220Q GRID K220Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.3 9 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 71 vote

Rate Quadro T2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.