CMP 30HX vs Quadro RTX 8000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 8000 and CMP 30HX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 8000
2018
48 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
49.97
+137%

RTX 8000 outperforms CMP 30HX by a whopping 137% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking60257
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.8821.51
Power efficiency13.4011.77
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU102TU116
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)25 February 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$9,999 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

CMP 30HX has 1044% better value for money than RTX 8000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46081408
Core clock speed1395 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors18,600 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate509.8157.1
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs28888
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 8000 49.97
+137%
CMP 30HX 21.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 8000 19278
+137%
CMP 30HX 8135

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 8000 147584
+117%
CMP 30HX 68128

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.97 21.09
Recency 13 August 2018 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 125 Watt

RTX 8000 has a 136.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 108% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the CMP 30HX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 464 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.