Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
VS
Radeon PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 3100 Radeon PRO WX 9100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.93
+129%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms PRO WX 2100 by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425639
Place by popularity35not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.10
Power efficiencyno data9.42
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeLexa
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)4 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speedno data925 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1219 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data39.01
Floating-point processing powerno data1.248 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data48 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+87.1%
30−35
−87.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+87.1%
30−35
−87.1%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+218%
10−12
−218%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+131%
12−14
−131%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+137%
30−33
−137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+64.7%
16−18
−64.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+444%
9−10
−444%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+860%
5−6
−860%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 860% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 33 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.93 4.77
Recency 15 August 2020 4 June 2017
Chip lithography 10 nm 14 nm

Iris Xe Graphics G7 has a 129.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
GTX 765M SLI GeForce GTX 765M SLI
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
Pro 555 Radeon Pro 555
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
GeForce MX150 GeForce MX150
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
ATI FireGL T2-128 FireGL T2 128
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
Stream Processor Stream Processor
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
GeForce2 MX 400 GeForce2 MX 400
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
GeForce MX110 GeForce MX110
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX Vega 10 Radeon RX Vega 10

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 2451 vote

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 37 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.