Radeon RX 6500 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon RX 6500, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6500 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a whopping 112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 461 | 271 |
Place by popularity | 76 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 23.49 | no data |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | no data |
GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | no data |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | no data |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Shared memory | + | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12_1 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 26
−92.3%
| 50−55
+92.3%
|
1440p | 16
−87.5%
| 30−35
+87.5%
|
4K | 11
−90.9%
| 21−24
+90.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20
−60%
|
30−35
+60%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 22
−100%
|
40−45
+100%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 21
−57.1%
|
30−35
+57.1%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−124%
|
65−70
+124%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 36
−11.1%
|
40−45
+11.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 16
−100%
|
30−35
+100%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−109%
|
45−50
+109%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
−104%
|
50−55
+104%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−95.2%
|
120−130
+95.2%
|
Hitman 3 | 24
−62.5%
|
35−40
+62.5%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 124
+29.2%
|
95−100
−29.2%
|
Metro Exodus | 35
−100%
|
70−75
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 17
−212%
|
50−55
+212%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30−35
−113%
|
65−70
+113%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 90
−1.1%
|
90−95
+1.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
−91.3%
|
40−45
+91.3%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18
−83.3%
|
30−35
+83.3%
|
Battlefield 5 | 27−30
−124%
|
65−70
+124%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 32
−25%
|
40−45
+25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 13
−146%
|
30−35
+146%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−109%
|
45−50
+109%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
−104%
|
50−55
+104%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−95.2%
|
120−130
+95.2%
|
Hitman 3 | 23
−69.6%
|
35−40
+69.6%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 112
+16.7%
|
95−100
−16.7%
|
Metro Exodus | 28
−146%
|
65−70
+146%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 26
−104%
|
50−55
+104%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 30
−120%
|
65−70
+120%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−73.1%
|
45−50
+73.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 84
−8.3%
|
90−95
+8.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 14
−214%
|
40−45
+214%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
−136%
|
30−35
+136%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 23
−95.7%
|
45−50
+95.7%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 11
−191%
|
30−35
+191%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
−109%
|
45−50
+109%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
−95.2%
|
120−130
+95.2%
|
Hitman 3 | 20
−100%
|
40−45
+100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 23
−95.7%
|
45−50
+95.7%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24
−108%
|
50−55
+108%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
−221%
|
45−50
+221%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
−49.2%
|
90−95
+49.2%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14
−92.9%
|
27−30
+92.9%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
−94.4%
|
35−40
+94.4%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
−92.9%
|
27−30
+92.9%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
−122%
|
20−22
+122%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
−260%
|
18−20
+260%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
−100%
|
18−20
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 7
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−12
−109%
|
21−24
+109%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−168%
|
110−120
+168%
|
Hitman 3 | 12−14
−108%
|
27−30
+108%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
−100%
|
40−45
+100%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
−108%
|
27−30
+108%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 19
−111%
|
40−45
+111%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−100%
|
18−20
+100%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 60−65
−95%
|
110−120
+95%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
−87.5%
|
30−33
+87.5%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
−100%
|
18−20
+100%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−100%
|
14−16
+100%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−200%
|
14−16
+200%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40
−164%
|
100−110
+164%
|
Metro Exodus | 7−8
−200%
|
21−24
+200%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12
−66.7%
|
20−22
+66.7%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−140%
|
12−14
+140%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−120%
|
10−12
+120%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−125%
|
27−30
+125%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 11
−90.9%
|
21−24
+90.9%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−167%
|
8−9
+167%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−100%
|
18−20
+100%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and RX 6500 compete in popular games:
- RX 6500 is 92% faster in 1080p
- RX 6500 is 88% faster in 1440p
- RX 6500 is 91% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 29% faster.
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- RX 6500 is ahead in 50 tests (75%)
- there's a draw in 15 tests (22%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 9.46 | 20.01 |
RX 6500 has a 111.5% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon RX 6500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.