Radeon RX 6800M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and Radeon RX 6800M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
9.47

RX 6800M outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by a whopping 264% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking467150
Place by popularity87not in top-100
Power efficiency23.1916.30
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 22
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (4 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speed400 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2390 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rateno data382.4
Floating-point processing powerno data12.24 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data12 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 9.47
RX 6800M 34.48
+264%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 6504
RX 6800M 40391
+521%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 25978
RX 6800M 77244
+197%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 5139
RX 6800M 34199
+565%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 26982
RX 6800M 160859
+496%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 208639
RX 6800M 482999
+131%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 1560
RX 6800M 11257
+622%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 39
RX 6800M 118
+200%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 44
RX 6800M 131
+199%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 4
RX 6800M 39
+978%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 39
RX 6800M 181
+369%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 8
RX 6800M 101
+1146%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 12
RX 6800M 60
+417%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 18
RX 6800M 141
+685%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 0
RX 6800M 3
+625%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs 39
RX 6800M 226
+482%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
−319%
109
+319%
1440p15
−380%
72
+380%
4K11
−300%
44
+300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20
−515%
123
+515%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
−236%
70−75
+236%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
−419%
109
+419%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−283%
110−120
+283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−588%
110
+588%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−245%
75−80
+245%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−231%
85−90
+231%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Hitman 3 24
−200%
70−75
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 124
−19.4%
140−150
+19.4%
Metro Exodus 35
−226%
110−120
+226%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
−476%
98
+476%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−294%
120−130
+294%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90
−34.4%
120−130
+34.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−222%
70−75
+222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
−400%
90
+400%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−283%
110−120
+283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 32
−119%
70−75
+119%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−685%
102
+685%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−245%
75−80
+245%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−231%
85−90
+231%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Hitman 3 23
−213%
70−75
+213%
Horizon Zero Dawn 112
−32.1%
140−150
+32.1%
Metro Exodus 28
−307%
110−120
+307%
Red Dead Redemption 2 26
−219%
83
+219%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−603%
211
+603%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−177%
70−75
+177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
−44%
120−130
+44%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
−429%
70−75
+429%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−457%
78
+457%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
−204%
70−75
+204%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−791%
98
+791%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−245%
75−80
+245%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−183%
170−180
+183%
Hitman 3 20
−260%
70−75
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 23
−648%
172
+648%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
−650%
180
+650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−679%
109
+679%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−13.1%
69
+13.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−571%
94
+571%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−261%
65−70
+261%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−271%
50−55
+271%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−311%
35−40
+311%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−1160%
63
+1160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−629%
51
+629%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−380%
190−200
+380%
Hitman 3 12−14
−231%
40−45
+231%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−535%
127
+535%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−538%
83
+538%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−663%
145
+663%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−422%
45−50
+422%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−195%
170−180
+195%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−481%
93
+481%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−278%
30−35
+278%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−1020%
56
+1020%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−326%
160−170
+326%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−400%
60
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−340%
21−24
+340%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−850%
38
+850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−300%
20−22
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−292%
45−50
+292%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−600%
77
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−1000%
33
+1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−456%
50
+456%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and RX 6800M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800M is 319% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800M is 380% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800M is 300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800M is 2200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6800M surpassed Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.47 34.48
Recency 15 August 2020 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 145 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs has 417.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6800M, on the other hand, has a 264.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 982 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 313 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.