Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce RTX 3070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 with Radeon PRO W7800, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
57.96

PRO W7800 outperforms RTX 3070 by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4115
Place by popularity38not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation59.1029.53
Power efficiency18.3619.88
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3070 has 100% better value for money than PRO W7800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58884480
Core clock speed1500 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2499 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate317.4699.7
Floating-point processing power20.31 TFLOPS44.78 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs184280
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores4670

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 57.96
PRO W7800 74.14
+27.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 22359
PRO W7800 28601
+27.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD150
−26.7%
190−200
+26.7%
1440p97
−23.7%
120−130
+23.7%
4K64
−25%
80−85
+25%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.3313.15
1440p5.1420.83
4K7.8031.24

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 147
−22.4%
180−190
+22.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 125
−20%
150−160
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100
−20%
120−130
+20%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−25%
230−240
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
−22.3%
170−180
+22.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−27.3%
140−150
+27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−21.4%
170−180
+21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−25%
280−290
+25%
Hitman 3 109
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−27.3%
280−290
+27.3%
Metro Exodus 144
−25%
180−190
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 118
−27.1%
150−160
+27.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 230−240
−24.5%
290−300
+24.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 174
−26.4%
220−230
+26.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−25%
150−160
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 87
−26.4%
110−120
+26.4%
Battlefield 5 180−190
−25%
230−240
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 126
−27%
160−170
+27%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−27.3%
140−150
+27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−21.4%
170−180
+21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−25%
280−290
+25%
Hitman 3 116
−20.7%
140−150
+20.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−27.3%
280−290
+27.3%
Metro Exodus 144
−25%
180−190
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−22.8%
140−150
+22.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 255
−17.6%
300−310
+17.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−24%
150−160
+24%
Watch Dogs: Legion 178
−23.6%
220−230
+23.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
−21.8%
95−100
+21.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
−27.5%
130−140
+27.5%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−27.3%
140−150
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−25%
280−290
+25%
Hitman 3 111
−26.1%
140−150
+26.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 181
−27.1%
230−240
+27.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 223
−25.6%
280−290
+25.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121
−24%
150−160
+24%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 116
−20.7%
140−150
+20.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−20%
150−160
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 68
−25%
85−90
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
−21%
75−80
+21%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−25%
85−90
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
−10.7%
300−310
+10.7%
Hitman 3 96
−25%
120−130
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 146
−23.3%
180−190
+23.3%
Metro Exodus 101
−18.8%
120−130
+18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 166
−26.5%
210−220
+26.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
−22.4%
120−130
+22.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 175
−25.7%
220−230
+25.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
−22.8%
140−150
+22.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%
Hitman 3 52
−25%
65−70
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
−23.9%
270−280
+23.9%
Metro Exodus 107
−21.5%
130−140
+21.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−22.2%
110−120
+22.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
−25%
60−65
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
−27.9%
55−60
+27.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−22%
50−55
+22%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−23.6%
110−120
+23.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
−23.7%
120−130
+23.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
−23.2%
85−90
+23.2%

This is how RTX 3070 and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7800 is 27% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7800 is 24% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7800 is 25% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 57.96 74.14
Recency 1 September 2020 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 260 Watt

RTX 3070 has 18.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800, on the other hand, has a 27.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 11032 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 31 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.