Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking781not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.00no data
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3eGA10B
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 May 2013 (11 years ago)March 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320512
Core clock speed200 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0010.00
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS0.64 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs4016
Tensor Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x4

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem shared + 128 MB eDRAMLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1067 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data34.14 GB/s
Shared memory+no data
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 10 Watt

Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB has a 175% more advanced lithography process, and 350% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 164 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Iris Pro Graphics 5200 or Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.