GeForce GTX 1650 vs HD Graphics P630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics P630 and GeForce GTX 1650, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics P630
2016
1740 MB DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4, 15 Watt
3.11

GTX 1650 outperforms HD Graphics P630 by a whopping 557% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking758269
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.84
Power efficiency14.2118.67
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 August 2016 (8 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed350 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4093.24
Floating-point processing power0.4224 TFLOPS2.984 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1740 MB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.2.131
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics P630 3.11
GTX 1650 20.43
+557%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics P630 1198
GTX 1650 7874
+557%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
−590%
69
+590%
1440p5−6
−680%
39
+680%
4K3−4
−633%
22
+633%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.16
1440pno data3.82
4Kno data6.77

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−489%
53
+489%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1217%
79
+1217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−643%
52
+643%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−967%
64
+967%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−900%
80
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1247%
229
+1247%
Hitman 3 8−9
−513%
49
+513%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1170%
292
+1170%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2425%
101
+2425%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−863%
77
+863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−785%
115
+785%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−474%
224
+474%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−822%
83
+822%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−3400%
35
+3400%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−1100%
72
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−557%
46
+557%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−767%
52
+767%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−600%
56
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1082%
201
+1082%
Hitman 3 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1030%
260
+1030%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−588%
55
+588%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−469%
74
+469%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−229%
45−50
+229%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−428%
206
+428%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−178%
25
+178%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−550%
39
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−282%
65
+282%
Hitman 3 8−9
−413%
41
+413%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−161%
60
+161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−377%
62
+377%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−200%
42
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+85.7%
21
−85.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−575%
54
+575%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−740%
42
+740%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−620%
36
+620%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−700%
24
+700%
Hitman 3 8−9
−238%
27
+238%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−438%
43
+438%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−663%
145
+663%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−483%
35
+483%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1900%
20
+1900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−750%
17
+750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−550%
13
+550%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−700%
8
+700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−325%
17
+325%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+0%
122
+0%
Metro Exodus 41
+0%
41
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 13
+0%
13
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+0%
26
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
+0%
26
+0%

This is how HD Graphics P630 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 is 590% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 is 680% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 is 633% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD Graphics P630 is 86% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 4600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics P630 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 61 test (85%)
  • there's a draw in 10 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.11 20.43
Recency 5 August 2016 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1740 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

HD Graphics P630 has 400% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650, on the other hand, has a 556.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 135.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P630 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics P630
HD Graphics P630
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 23772 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.