Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs HD Graphics 2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2000 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 2000
2011
0.55
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.26
+4856%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 2000 by a whopping 4856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1211200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.29
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT1AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed850 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown35 Watt
Texture fill rate8.100129.6
Floating-point processing power0.1296 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2000 0.55
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26
+4856%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+7303%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−4445%
500−550
+4445%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4721%
1350−1400
+4721%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4721%
1350−1400
+4721%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−4567%
140−150
+4567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%
Hitman 3 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−4650%
190−200
+4650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−4721%
1350−1400
+4721%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−4733%
290−300
+4733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4650%
95−100
+4650%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 4445% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 27.26
Recency 1 February 2011 26 February 2024
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 4856.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 2000
HD Graphics 2000
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 1288 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 15 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.