Arc A530M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 Ti with Arc A530M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4070 Ti
2023
12 GB GDDR6X, 285 Watt
82.58
+366%

RTX 4070 Ti outperforms Arc A530M by a whopping 366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6308
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.90no data
Power efficiency19.8618.71
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAD104DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76801536
Core clock speed2310 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed2610 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)285 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate626.4124.8
Floating-point processing power40.09 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs8048
TMUs24096
Tensor Cores240192
Ray Tracing Cores6012

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Ti 82.58
+366%
Arc A530M 17.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Ti 31820
+365%
Arc A530M 6836

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD232
+416%
45−50
−416%
1440p152
+407%
30−35
−407%
4K96
+433%
18−21
−433%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.44no data
1440p5.26no data
4K8.32no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 236
+11700%
2−3
−11700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+5500%
3−4
−5500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+410%
30−33
−410%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+388%
50−55
−388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 218
+10800%
2−3
−10800%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+392%
24−27
−392%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+403%
40−45
−403%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+408%
50−55
−408%
Hitman 3 120−130
+3125%
4−5
−3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+3550%
8−9
−3550%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+417%
30−33
−417%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+417%
24−27
−417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+8950%
4−5
−8950%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+450%
27−30
−450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+5500%
3−4
−5500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+410%
30−33
−410%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+388%
50−55
−388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 185
+9150%
2−3
−9150%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+392%
24−27
−392%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+403%
40−45
−403%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+408%
50−55
−408%
Hitman 3 120−130
+3125%
4−5
−3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+3550%
8−9
−3550%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+417%
30−33
−417%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+417%
24−27
−417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 473
+11725%
4−5
−11725%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+1944%
9−10
−1944%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+450%
27−30
−450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+5500%
3−4
−5500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+410%
30−33
−410%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+5900%
2−3
−5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 167
+8250%
2−3
−8250%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+392%
24−27
−392%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+408%
50−55
−408%
Hitman 3 120−130
+3125%
4−5
−3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 351
+4288%
8−9
−4288%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 410
+10150%
4−5
−10150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 222
+2367%
9−10
−2367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 152
+443%
27−30
−443%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+417%
24−27
−417%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+374%
35−40
−374%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+367%
24−27
−367%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+376%
21−24
−376%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
+424%
21−24
−424%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+413%
16−18
−413%
Cyberpunk 2077 105 0−1
Far Cry 5 80−85
+367%
18−20
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+393%
55−60
−393%
Hitman 3 120−130
+1917%
6−7
−1917%
Horizon Zero Dawn 273
+13550%
2−3
−13550%
Metro Exodus 148
+393%
30−33
−393%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 280
+367%
60−65
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+423%
30−33
−423%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+380%
50−55
−380%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+6200%
2−3
−6200%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+393%
14−16
−393%
Hitman 3 75−80
+375%
16−18
−375%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+402%
45−50
−402%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+370%
30−33
−370%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
+397%
30−33
−397%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+7100%
1−2
−7100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+380%
10−11
−380%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+374%
35−40
−374%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
+367%
30−33
−367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 68
+386%
14−16
−386%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+4900%
2−3
−4900%

This is how RTX 4070 Ti and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 416% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 407% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 433% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti is 13550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 Ti surpassed Arc A530M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 82.58 17.74
Recency 3 January 2023 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 285 Watt 65 Watt

RTX 4070 Ti has a 365.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 338.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A530M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6995 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 195 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.