Radeon PRO W7800 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 Ti with Radeon PRO W7800, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070 Ti
2021
8 GB GDDR6X, 290 Watt
61.12

PRO W7800 outperforms RTX 3070 Ti by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3216
Place by popularity92not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.6729.90
Power efficiency14.4519.46
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date31 May 2021 (3 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3070 Ti has 76% better value for money than PRO W7800.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61444480
Core clock speed1575 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2499 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)290 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate339.8699.7
Floating-point processing power21.75 TFLOPS44.78 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs192280
Tensor Cores192no data
Ray Tracing Cores4870

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm280 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1188 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth608.3 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 Ti 61.12
PRO W7800 73.80
+20.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 Ti 23553
PRO W7800 28439
+20.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD177
−18.6%
210−220
+18.6%
1440p95
−15.8%
110−120
+15.8%
4K61
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.3811.90
1440p6.3122.72
4K9.8235.70

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 174
−20.7%
210−220
+20.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 171
−17%
200−210
+17%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%
Battlefield 5 190−200
−17.9%
230−240
+17.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−15%
130−140
+15%
Cyberpunk 2077 138
−15.9%
160−170
+15.9%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−14.9%
170−180
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−18.4%
270−280
+18.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−17.9%
270−280
+17.9%
Metro Exodus 150−160
−16.1%
180−190
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−19.7%
140−150
+19.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240−250
−20.5%
300−310
+20.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−14.1%
170−180
+14.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 120−130
−18.1%
150−160
+18.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%
Battlefield 5 190−200
−17.9%
230−240
+17.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−15%
130−140
+15%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
−15.7%
140−150
+15.7%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
−14.9%
170−180
+14.9%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−18.4%
270−280
+18.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−17.9%
270−280
+17.9%
Metro Exodus 150−160
−16.1%
180−190
+16.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−19.7%
140−150
+19.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 316
−10.8%
350−400
+10.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
−16.3%
150−160
+16.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
−14.1%
170−180
+14.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 103
−16.5%
120−130
+16.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 100−110
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
−15%
130−140
+15%
Cyberpunk 2077 111
−17.1%
130−140
+17.1%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−16.1%
130−140
+16.1%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
−18.4%
270−280
+18.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
−13.8%
140−150
+13.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 243
−19.3%
290−300
+19.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 274
−9.5%
300−310
+9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
−15.6%
170−180
+15.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 108
−20.4%
130−140
+20.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−19.7%
140−150
+19.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
−17.6%
160−170
+17.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 93
−18.3%
110−120
+18.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
−20%
90−95
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
−16.4%
85−90
+16.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−19.7%
85−90
+19.7%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
−10.7%
300−310
+10.7%
Hitman 3 85−90
−13.6%
100−105
+13.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 184
−19.6%
220−230
+19.6%
Metro Exodus 135
−18.5%
160−170
+18.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 205
−17.1%
240−250
+17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
−14.3%
120−130
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
−20.2%
280−290
+20.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
−15.4%
120−130
+15.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−19.7%
85−90
+19.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Hitman 3 50−55
−15.4%
60−65
+15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
−17.1%
260−270
+17.1%
Metro Exodus 90−95
−9.9%
100−105
+9.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
−19.3%
130−140
+19.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
−20.7%
70−75
+20.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
−17.6%
140−150
+17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%

This is how RTX 3070 Ti and PRO W7800 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7800 is 19% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7800 is 16% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7800 is 15% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 61.12 73.80
Recency 31 May 2021 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 290 Watt 260 Watt

PRO W7800 has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 60% more advanced lithography process, and 11.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon PRO W7800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7800 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
AMD Radeon PRO W7800
Radeon PRO W7800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6100 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 35 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.