Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce MX570

Place in the ranking	354	425
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	41.03	18.67
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	no data
GPU code name	GA107	no data
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	May 2022 (2 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1536
Core clock speed	832 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1155 MHz	1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	73.92	no data
Floating-point processing power	4.731 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	40	no data
TMUs	64	no data
Tensor Cores	64	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12_1
Shader Model	6.6	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-
CUDA	8.6	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

41
+5.1%

−5.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +13%	23 −13%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Elden Ring	45−50 +40.6%	30−35 −40.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +33.3%	35−40 −33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +18.2%	22 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +8.9%	56 −8.9%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +24.1%	27−30 −24.1%
Valorant	55−60 +40.5%	40−45 −40.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +33.3%	35−40 −33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +36.8%	19 −36.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Dota 2	12 −200%	36 +200%
Elden Ring	45−50 +40.6%	30−35 −40.6%
Far Cry 5	68 +54.5%	40−45 −54.5%
Fortnite	80−85 +29.7%	60−65 −29.7%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +27.1%	48 −27.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +47.2%	36 −47.2%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +27.4%	80−85 −27.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +24.1%	27−30 −24.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +36.4%	30−35 −36.4%
Valorant	55−60 +40.5%	40−45 −40.5%
World of Tanks	190−200 +24.5%	150−160 −24.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +33.3%	35−40 −33.3%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +52.9%	17 −52.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +38.1%	21−24 −38.1%
Dota 2	50−55 +54.3%	35−40 −54.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +25%	40−45 −25%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +48.8%	41 −48.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +27.4%	80−85 −27.4%
Valorant	55−60 +40.5%	40−45 −40.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Elden Ring	21−24 +43.8%	16−18 −43.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +46.7%	14−16 −46.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 +38.9%	95−100 −38.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
World of Tanks	100−110 +31.6%	75−80 −31.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +50%	24−27 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +44%	24−27 −44%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +45.5%	21−24 −45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Valorant	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Dota 2	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Elden Ring	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +37.5%	30−35 −37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Dota 2	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Fortnite	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +50%	14−16 −50%
Valorant	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%

This is how GeForce MX570 and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is 5% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 67% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games: