Quadro 4000M vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with Quadro 4000M, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.72
+43%

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) outperforms 4000M by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking646740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.35
Power efficiencyno data2.26
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGF104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)22 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32336
Core clock speed350 MHz475 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data56

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data625 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 4.72
+43%
Quadro 4000M 3.30

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 3168
+51.4%
Quadro 4000M 2092

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) 13644
+27.3%
Quadro 4000M 10722

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−294%
71
+294%
1440p25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
4K12
+50%
8−9
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.32
1440pno data28.06
4Kno data56.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
Hitman 3 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Metro Exodus 22
+340%
5−6
−340%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
Hitman 3 9
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Metro Exodus 16
+220%
5−6
−220%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
Hitman 3 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
−140%
24−27
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−87.5%
14−16
+87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
+12.5%
40−45
−12.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Hitman 3 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and Quadro 4000M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro 4000M is 294% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 56% faster in 1440p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is 450% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro 4000M is 140% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is ahead in 57 tests (92%)
  • Quadro 4000M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.72 3.30
Recency 11 May 2021 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has a 43% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000M in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M
Quadro 4000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 33 votes

Rate Quadro 4000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.