Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

Go 6100 Go 6100 + nForce Go 430 Go 6150 Go 6150 + nForce Go 430 Go 6200 Go 6250 Go 6400 Go 6600 Go 6600 NPB 128M Go 6600 TE Go 6800 Go 6800 Ultra
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6800 Ultra with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Go 6800 Ultra
2005
256 MB GDDR3, 89 Watt
0.36

T1200 Mobile outperforms Go 6800 Ultra by a whopping 5300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Go 6800 Ultra Go 6800 Ultra
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1282285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.2875.31
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV41TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date24 February 2005 (19 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores171024
Core clock speed450 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors190 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate5.40091.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−5700%
58
+5700%
1440p0−133
4K1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−650%
60
+650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1375%
59
+1375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−92.9%
54
+92.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1900%
40−45
+1900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−875%
35−40
+875%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−488%
47
+488%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−1000%
44
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−689%
71
+689%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−67.9%
47
+67.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1367%
40−45
+1367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−5150%
210−220
+5150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4900%
400−450
+4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−5150%
210−220
+5150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−311%
37
+311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+47.4%
19
−47.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 12−14
Hitman 3 6−7
−4900%
300−310
+4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 10−11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4900%
100−105
+4900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+0%
47
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+0%
28
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+0%
32
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+0%
18
+0%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+0%
12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Hitman 3 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Go 6800 Ultra and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 5700% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 8000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Go 6800 Ultra is 47% faster.
  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 1900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Go 6800 Ultra is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 20 tests (30%)
  • there's a draw in 45 tests (68%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.36 19.44
Recency 24 February 2005 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 5300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983.3% more advanced lithography process, and 394.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
9650M GT GeForce 9650M GT
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
Go 6800 Ultra GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
vs
HD 8180 Radeon HD 8180
ATI HD 4250 Radeon HD 4250
vs
ATI 3000 IGP Radeon 3000 IGP
Go 7700 GeForce Go 7700
vs
PRO W7900 Radeon PRO W7900
FX 380M Quadro FX 380M
vs
UHD Graphics 610 UHD Graphics 610
HD 7430M Radeon HD 7430M
vs
Apple M1 7-Core GPU M1 7 Core GPU
HD 6370M Radeon HD 6370M
vs
T600 T600
FX 880M Quadro FX 880M
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Mobility Radeon HD 4650
vs
RX Vega 7 Radeon RX Vega 7
GT 425M GeForce GT 425M
vs
7950 GX2 GeForce 7950 GX2
HD 6530M Radeon HD 6530M
vs
HD 7450A Radeon HD 7450A
HD 6530M Radeon HD 6530M
vs
HD 6450M Radeon HD 6450M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 141 vote

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.